Posted in: Quality Testing
Botanical extract testing should be based on the plant material, extraction process, specification, intended use and destination market. A long list of tests is not automatically a better control plan; the important question is whether the selected tests address the material’s actual risks and the buyer’s requirements.
Identity and Assay
Identity testing helps confirm that the material is what it claims to be. The appropriate approach may depend on the botanical species, plant part, extract type and degree of processing. Assay or active-marker testing measures a defined constituent or group of constituents using an agreed method.
Buyers should compare the method, units, basis of calculation and acceptance range, not just the headline percentage. Different methods can produce results that are not directly comparable.
Microbiological Parameters
Specifications may include total aerobic count, yeast and mold, and specified microorganisms. Limits should reflect the ingredient, processing conditions, intended application and applicable requirements. The COA should make clear which tests were performed for the batch.
Heavy Metals
Elemental contaminant review commonly considers lead, cadmium, arsenic and mercury, but the exact limits and reporting basis depend on the product and market. Agricultural source, soil, water and processing can influence risk. Buyers should define the relevant limits rather than relying on an undefined “heavy metals pass” statement.
Pesticide Residues
Pesticide scope may include a multi-residue screen and, where relevant, targeted compounds associated with the crop or origin. For food placed on the European market, Regulation (EC) No 396/2005 is an official reference for maximum residue levels. Applicability must be assessed for the specific commodity and use.
Residual Solvents, ETO and PAHs
Residual solvent testing may be relevant when solvents are used in extraction or downstream processing. Ethylene oxide testing can be important for materials or markets where treatment history and regulatory expectations create a risk. Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons may be considered when drying, heating, smoke exposure or other processing conditions make them relevant.
The EU contaminant framework in Commission Regulation (EU) 2023/915 provides official maximum levels for certain contaminants in food. Buyers should confirm the current category and limit applicable to their material or finished product.
Third-Party Reports Are Sample-Specific
A laboratory report applies to the sample identified in the report. Check sample identification, dates, methods, analytes, reporting limits and results. Do not extend a result to every future batch unless the supply agreement and testing program support that conclusion.
The Good Nutrition Bio quality control page provides selected pesticide, ETO and PAHs reports for named samples. Buyers should request the current specification, commercial-batch COA and applicable report set for the material offered.
Build the Test Plan Before Ordering
- Define the ingredient and intended use.
- Identify product, process and origin-related risks.
- Map destination-market and customer limits.
- Agree methods, units and acceptance criteria.
- Decide which tests are routine and which require third-party confirmation.
- Link the final documents to the commercial batch.
Related Buyer Resources
See a real example: our Boswellia Extract 85% product page includes ETO test report and quality documentation for buyer review.